Reasonable choice of workshop's centralized dust collection sys

  • The workshop's centralized dust collection system has three options for centralized dust collection system: dust, that is, like all diseases, prevention is always better than treatment. For example, a flow trough is added during material handling, belt transfer, so dust, or dust generation and handling can be greatly reduced; In the treatment of steel slag and other loose materials, the use of local sealing, so that the generated dust, dust in the circulation of its kinetic energy, most of the dust will settle down naturally. This kind of mechanical dust, dust removal in foreign countries is known as no power dust removal, in how many occasions most of the dust is suitable for the use of no power dust removal; At least the non-dynamic dust removal should be pretreated first.

    Secondly, the auxiliary use of spray mist, or foam dust removal. On the one hand, the direct spray can make the dust particles wet, stick to each other, condense and grow up, and then it is easy to separate the atmosphere; On the other hand, for the flue gas with relatively high temperature, direct spray to achieve evaporative cooling can use a small amount of water to cool the flue gas, volume shrinkage, speed reduction is also conducive to dust removal. Past textbooks, design manuals have said that spray dust is only suitable for handling 50? For dust above m, the dust removal efficiency is only 40-70%. Practical experience has proved that due to the progress of spray technology, 10?? Can be removed by spraying system. Dust above m is close to 100%, 1? Dust above m can also be removed by 90-95%. For example, tunic ladling and spray dust removal for steel slag treatment have actually reached a high dust removal efficiency of 90-95%.

    Therefore, from the perspective of emission reduction, energy saving and cost reduction, we must first consider non-dynamic dust removal and direct spray dust removal, and only consider the third choice when we have to: ventilation dust removal. Because as long as the selection of ventilation dust removal, there must be a high energy consumption fan and dust collector, energy saving and cost reduction is more difficult. When the ventilation dust removal system is used, the electric dust removal with low energy consumption should be considered first, and the cloth bag dust collector should be considered finally. After reflecting on the actual selection order of our current workshop's centralized dust collection system according to this thinking, some problems worthy of improvement can be found: For example, converter secondary dust removal, blast furnace iron field dust removal, loading and unloading material dust removal and many other similar applications, dust particles 80%, or even more than 90% are 10? m above, but in our country almost most of the ventilation dust removal, and the cloth bag dust collector, has solved the problem of emission reduction, but the operating costs are very high; Most of the dust in the converter LT method is coarse particles, but the inlet concentration of electric dust removal is designed in accordance with 70-100 g/meter, resulting in a large electric field and large equipment. Of course, some electrostatic precipitator efficiency instability is also a practical problem that must be solved.

    workshop's centralized dust collection system https://www.kaisenfilter.com/Central-Dust-Collector